Use Case · Traffic Safety

Turning Traffic Data into Decisions That Save Lives

How a predictive risk model — powered by generative AI and embedded into operational workflows — enables traffic authorities to anticipate accidents and act before they happen.

Score / km
Predictive Risk per Road Segment
3 Layers
Internal Data, External Sources & NLP on Reports
End-to-End
From Analysis to Intervention in One Platform
Chapter 1

The Problem and the Data Foundation

The challenge for any traffic authority is straightforward: holidays and adverse weather conditions create unpredictable risk spikes, yet enforcement resources are finite. Deploying teams without data is, in practice, guesswork. Volis addresses this by building a unified data foundation that breaks down silos between internal systems and external sources — transforming scattered records into actionable intelligence.

Data lineage makes the connection transparent: every source that feeds the model is traceable. Decision-makers don't have to trust the AI blindly — they can audit the logic behind every risk score, all the way back to its origin.

Data Ingestion Architecture

INTERNAL DATA Accident History Driver Profiles Incident Reports Vehicle Records EXTERNAL SOURCES OpenStreetMap (Geometry) Holiday Calendar Hyperlocal Weather Volis Engine NLP + ML + Foundry Risk Score Per road segment Dashboard Manager

Three Layers of Intelligence

The model's depth comes from combining sources that conventional systems overlook. Incident reports are processed with NLP to extract critical variables — such as road type, pavement condition, or vehicle characteristics — that simply don't exist in structured database fields.

  • Proprietary Data: Accident history, driver profiles, and vehicle records from the institution itself.
  • External Context: Road geometry, public holidays, and hyperlocal weather enriching every prediction.
  • Language Processing: Generative AI extracting variables from unstructured incident reports.

Sources & Integrations

Data Source Data Type Method
Traffic Authority / Internal CRM Accident History & Vehicle Records Automated
OpenStreetMap Road Geometry & Curvature Automated
Weather API Rainfall & Conditions by GPS Automated
Incident Reports Free Text (via NLP) Generative AI

* Data pipeline operated on Palantir Foundry infrastructure.

Demo: Data Lineage

Chapter 2

Predictive Modeling & Geospatial Risk Analysis

The model assigns a risk score to every road segment, cross-referencing historical variables against projected scenarios — a holiday weekend, a stretch of heavy rain, or both combined. Decision-makers don't just receive an alert: they receive the logic behind it. Which factors are elevating risk on that specific mile? By how much? This explainability is what turns a prediction into operational conviction.

Scenario Comparison Logic

Standard Week Reference Baseline Scenario of Interest e.g.: Holiday + Rain Overlapping environmental variables Score recalculated in real time Heat Map Risk relative to baseline High Moderate Segment Drill-Down 4-year accident history Risk factors (SHAP) → State benchmark

From the Highway to the Exact Stretch

The platform lets managers drill down from the state level to a single road segment. In the João Melão Highway example, the model flagged a risk 78% above the state average during holiday periods — and surfaced the two main drivers: expressway classification (62 mph speed limit) and the high curvature of that stretch. From there, countermeasure recommendations are precise and justified, not generic.

  • History Filter: Identification of segments with 10 or more incidents over the past 4 years.
  • State Benchmark: Relative performance comparison across the entire road network.
  • Integrated Street View: Visual inspection of the segment directly within the platform.

Risk Factors Explained

Risk Variable Score Impact Nature
Expressway Classification Primary (max.) Structural
Road Curvature Secondary Structural
Holiday / High Traffic Relevant Temporal
Rain / Adverse Conditions Relevant Temporal

* Explainability via SHAP Values — every score is fully auditable by the manager.

Demo: Predictive & Geospatial Analysis

Chapter 3

Generative AI, Intervention & Continuous Improvement Loop

Identifying risk is half the work. The other half is acting — and learning from it. The platform connects analysis to operational workflow in a single click: a manager creates an intervention, the AI validates feasibility, estimates cost-benefit, and drafts the technical requirements. Humans decide; the machine handles the heavy lifting of analysis and documentation.

Flow: From Analysis to Intervention

Forensic Analysis Generative AI Sanitized incident summaries Recommendation Manager selects countermeasure category AIP Agent · Validates feasibility · Calculates cost vs. impact · Drafts technical requirements Approval Human Final decision Execution + Measurement Feedback → Model

AI That Reads What Humans Can't Process

Incident reports are sensitive, dense, and unstructured documents. The platform's generative AI produces sanitized summaries — stripping confidential data while preserving only the critical variables. A two-way road accident, vehicles over 15 years old, a chain-reaction collision: information that would never fit a form field, but that now feeds the model and sharpens future predictions.

The Countermeasure Board

Every intervention created moves through a phase pipeline visible to the entire team. AI agents run in parallel — validating, calculating, and documenting — while managers focus their time exclusively on decisions that require human judgment. The outcome is on record: each countermeasure has its impact measured, building a history that makes the model more precise with every cycle.

Countermeasure Management Pipeline

Each intervention moves through the phases below. AI agents handle the analytical steps; human managers own the strategic decisions.

Phase 01
Feasibility
AIP Agent validates technically and calculates the projected cost-benefit of the action.
Phase 02
Approval
Manager reviews the analysis and issues approval based on data, not intuition.
Phase 03
Execution
Field team implements the countermeasure with technical requirements pre-drafted by AI.
Phase 04
Results
Platform monitors post-intervention incidents and measures the real-world impact of the action.
Phase 05
Feedback Loop
Success and failure history feeds back into the model, continuously refining future suggestions.

Demo: Generative AI & Countermeasure Management

Conclusion

From scattered data to lives preserved. With evidence at every step.

The platform doesn't just predict — it creates an intelligence cycle that improves with every intervention carried out. Decision-makers act on data, AI handles the analytical workload, and the model learns from results. If your operation still relies on subjective criteria to allocate road safety resources — that problem has already been solved. We can do the same for you.

Volis Symbol